A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence- Hello readers The attorney thesis, On the article you read this time with the title A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence, We have prepared this article for you to read and take the information inside. Hopefully the contents of the
post Which we write is understandable. All right, happy reading.
Title: A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
link : A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
About the Author:
You are now reading the article A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence With the link address http://attorneythesis.blogspot.com/2016/04/a-forensic-psychiatrist-examines.html
Title: A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
link : A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
The education and training of this individual is threefold. He or she is a medical doctor. He continues training as a psychiatrist. Thirdly, he trains to answer questions about psychiatric classifications as related to the law. The forensic psychiatrist determines whether someone is fit to stand trial or not.
For legal purposes, the finding of insanity is very stringent. First the mental status is diagnosed. Then, the subject must have been unable to judge what he was doing was wrong. That incompetency had to have been in effect when the crime was committed.
One example is the patient who is functional when medicated regularly. However, this patient, when the medication is working, will think he no longer needs medication. This is untrue. When he goes off the medication, at that time he is incapable of telling right from wrong.
The alleged has his sanity judged as legally sane or insane. The psychiatrist advises the judge as to how to rule after his evaluation. His opinion is based on the mental state of the accused at the time he committed the crime being adjudicated.
This will, in the majority and perhaps all of the cases, be a violent crime. It may range from sexual assault to first degree murder. This expert is protecting the rights of the accused. He is also protecting the public from having a dangerous predator loose on the street.
The schizophrenic wears a mantle of normalcy when he is under the proper medication. The caveat is that, when unsupervised, he is unlikely to continue taking the pills. Gradually, he will return to the dangerous predator he was before starting on the medication.
When called upon as an expert witness the psychiatrist testifies under oath. He will have interviewed the accused a sufficient number of hours to diagnose him. His opinion is presented without regard to what either attorney is attempting to prove. But, a defense attorney may consult him and call upon him to testify only when the diagnosis supports his opinion. The prosecuting attorney will also use an expert witness who supports his assumption of guilt.
The judge receives a report detailing the findings. He and the jury are the only people the witness is supposed to influence. The judge relies on his expert opinion to guide him in passing sentence because his own expertise is in the law.
The judge has guidelines as to the number of years in prison he can sentence a criminal offender to for a specific crime. The psychiatrist has mental health guidelines. His diagnosis of legal competency must comply with those.
There are very specific criterion to be met. At the time the crime was committed, the accused must have been unaware of what he was doing. Alternatively, he could not appreciate the wrongfulness of the crime because of a mental disease. If the psychiatrist or the judge do not make correct determinations, the public will be endangered. If sent to a mental institution instead of prison, it is possible he may hurt someone there.
For legal purposes, the finding of insanity is very stringent. First the mental status is diagnosed. Then, the subject must have been unable to judge what he was doing was wrong. That incompetency had to have been in effect when the crime was committed.
One example is the patient who is functional when medicated regularly. However, this patient, when the medication is working, will think he no longer needs medication. This is untrue. When he goes off the medication, at that time he is incapable of telling right from wrong.
The alleged has his sanity judged as legally sane or insane. The psychiatrist advises the judge as to how to rule after his evaluation. His opinion is based on the mental state of the accused at the time he committed the crime being adjudicated.
This will, in the majority and perhaps all of the cases, be a violent crime. It may range from sexual assault to first degree murder. This expert is protecting the rights of the accused. He is also protecting the public from having a dangerous predator loose on the street.
The schizophrenic wears a mantle of normalcy when he is under the proper medication. The caveat is that, when unsupervised, he is unlikely to continue taking the pills. Gradually, he will return to the dangerous predator he was before starting on the medication.
When called upon as an expert witness the psychiatrist testifies under oath. He will have interviewed the accused a sufficient number of hours to diagnose him. His opinion is presented without regard to what either attorney is attempting to prove. But, a defense attorney may consult him and call upon him to testify only when the diagnosis supports his opinion. The prosecuting attorney will also use an expert witness who supports his assumption of guilt.
The judge receives a report detailing the findings. He and the jury are the only people the witness is supposed to influence. The judge relies on his expert opinion to guide him in passing sentence because his own expertise is in the law.
The judge has guidelines as to the number of years in prison he can sentence a criminal offender to for a specific crime. The psychiatrist has mental health guidelines. His diagnosis of legal competency must comply with those.
There are very specific criterion to be met. At the time the crime was committed, the accused must have been unaware of what he was doing. Alternatively, he could not appreciate the wrongfulness of the crime because of a mental disease. If the psychiatrist or the judge do not make correct determinations, the public will be endangered. If sent to a mental institution instead of prison, it is possible he may hurt someone there.
About the Author:
If you are looking for information about forensic psychiatrist, pay a visit to our web pages online here today. Additional details are available at http://childadultforensics.com now.
You're finished read the article A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence
That's an article A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Okay, see you in other article posted.
You are now reading the article A Forensic Psychiatrist Examines The Accused To Determine His Legal Mental Competence With the link address http://attorneythesis.blogspot.com/2016/04/a-forensic-psychiatrist-examines.html